The Detroit Free Press published an article that omitted some key information regarding ObamaCare. Was it just a coincidence that this omission helped to portray ObamaCare in a more favorable light? Was this omission a planned attempt to deceive or just incomplete journalism? I’ll never know for sure but I have my suspicions. I’m sure you’ll have your suspicions also.
What I can say is that I’ve written a couple of letters to the editors of the Free Press regarding past inaccuracies. I’m not surprised that the Free Press chose not to publish my letters as they pointed out obvious misrepresentations contained within their stories. When a news organization portrays itself as an “arbiter of truth” they are unlikely to publish letters that point out their incomplete or biased reporting as that could impact their bottom line. If enough readers viewed their news articles as incomplete or biased it could reduce the number of readers willing to pay for their products. Wait a minute! This has happened already as the Free Press has had a decline in readership such that it implemented a drastic cut back in their home delivery.
This post will elaborate on the omission I observed in the ObamaCare article. You won’t have to just take my word for it as I provide links to sources where you can verify the information yourself. The Free Press article, written August 9 by Todd Spangler, is titled, “Plenty of misinformation in health care debate”. This article tries to present the impression that the Free Press will clear up the misinformation and provide the reader with the unvarnished truth. As part of their analysis the Free Press concludes that illegal immigrants will not have access to free health care under HR3200 (ObamaCare). The Free Press wrote:
Here’s what we found: That page of the bill prohibits discrimination in health care. And in Section 246 — on Page 143 — federal health care payments for people in the country illegally are explicitly prohibited.
While the Free Press’ findings may be true it does not mean that illegal immigrant won’t get free health care. How can that be?! Well, the Free Press did not publish the whole story. They left out some key information. As pointed out in a previous post, Rat Out Gary Peters to flag@whitehouse.gov , the House Energy and Commerce Committee voted down an amendment to HR3200 that would have explicitly denied Medicaid health care benefits to illegal aliens. This amendment, introduced by Nathan Deal (R-Ga), was defeated in committee by a 29-28 vote. When presented with an opportunity to clarify their position on this topic, Congress chose not to.
So, at the end of the day, will illegal immigrants have access to free health care? It certainly appears that way to me. But the Free Press concludes otherwise without presenting the full story.
This sort of reminds me of what it’s like to buy a used car. You look at it. Kick the tires. Maybe you take a test drive. You ask the salesman about it. He says it had a minor repair to the door after a fender bender. But when you drove it there was a lot of wind noise. The paint was off-color just slightly on the entire driver’s side. And, a few other things just didn’t add up. He wasn’t being dishonest—he told you about the accident and that the door was repaired. But he didn’t tell you about all the other repairs that evidently were made or how extensive the damage really was.
Isn’t the Free Press a lot like a used car salesman? Would you buy a car from the Free Press?
In the interest of full disclosure the following links are provided:
Congressman Deal’s comments on his amendment.
See how your Congressman voted on the Deal Amendment.
View the entire Free Press article.
© 2009 LimitGovNow. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to LimitGovNow with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.